Adoption

AI floods UK councils with complaints⁠.

Councils, schools and police forces report a surge in complaints written with AI, many long and inaccurate, and the backlog is slowing down the genuine ones. Any British firm with a complaints inbox should take note.1

A wave of envelopes marked with a sparkle symbol pours from a giant speech bubble onto a British town hall flying the Union flag, as a clerk pushes against its doors.
Picture: Hardy & Butler.
01 / The story

AI floods UK councils with complaints

The Independent reports that public bodies across the UK are receiving far more complaints, as Britons turn to AI to write them1. Councils, schools and police forces are among the bodies reporting a sharp rise in complaints drafted by large language models1. The complaints themselves are often needlessly long, inaccurate and full of nonsensical legalese1.

Experts told the paper that some of the rise is petty and spurious complaining, simply because it now takes so little time1. Alongside those are people with a real grievance, helped by AI to take part, who now sit in backlogs that the surge has created1. Employment tribunal claims in the UK rose by 39 per cent from January to March this year, according to data compiled by The Economist, and some claimants are now waiting until 2029 for a hearing1.

The journalist Sam Freedman called it a collective action problem: for any one person AI makes complaining easier, but if everyone does it, everyone waits longer for a decision1. Councillor Richard Clewer of the Local Government Association said the longer and more complex complaints are adding to the administrative load at a time of real pressure on resources1. Caseworkers in MPs' offices told The Independent that around half of the cases they now receive are at least partly written by AI, and described them as verbose and hard to engage with1.

The consumer campaigner Helen Dewdney, who runs the blog The Complaining Cow, said AI gets a great deal wrong1. Asked to write a broadband complaint, it threatened Ofcom when the right route was an Alternative Dispute Resolution provider, and gave no advice on gathering evidence1. She said it works when the writer supplies correct information from reliable sources and asks it only to put the complaint together1.

Councils are looking at possible future government action so that their rules stay fit for purpose, Mr Clewer said1. Mr Freedman expects bodies to make complaining harder or to answer complaints with AI, and warned that you cannot simply filter out AI-written ones because some are genuine1. Do that, he said, and it becomes chatbots talking to each other1.

Your inbox is next

The story is about the public sector, but nothing in it stops at the town hall. If writing a complaint to a council now takes a minute, so does writing one to your company, your landlord or your supplier. Expect more of them, longer ones, and more that cite rules that do not apply. The awkward part is the one Mr Freedman names: some of the long, odd ones are real, and a customer with a real grievance who gets brushed off will not be pleased to learn a filter did it.

The sensible response is dull. Know how many complaints you get and how long they take, so you can see a rise when it comes. Ask for the facts you need up front, in a short form, rather than reading ten paragraphs to find them. If you do use AI to sort or answer them, keep a person on the ones that matter and check what it says before it goes out. A reply that gets your own obligations wrong is worse than a slow one.

Also today

  • Socceroo Cristian Volpato licenses his AI likeness

    The Australian footballer has signed a deal with California-based Callandor to license an AI version of himself, part of a wider scramble by athletes to control and earn from their digital identities2.

  • Fraudsters are stealing session cookies to take over accounts

    The Guardian explains how hackers hijack a logged-in session with a bank or other account by stealing its session cookie, and says logging out each time is among the best defences3.

  • Pennsylvania signs a law requiring labels on AI-generated adverts

    Governor Josh Shapiro signed the Artificial Intelligence Deceptive Advertising Act, which requires any advert significantly modified or generated by AI to carry a label in the same format as the advert4.

  • Study finds Grok and GPT pick opposite parties when pushed

    Asked through their APIs who to vote for, Grok 4.7 chose the Republican in 92% of answers and GPT-6.1 Sol the Democrat in 97%, though the consumer apps refused to answer5.

Share this briefing

The Wire weekly is paused.

No weekly email is being sent. The daily Wire briefings carry on, here on this website. Leave your email address and we will tell you if the weekly starts again. We keep it for that and for nothing else.

We confirm the address by email first. How we handle it.

Back to The Wire

02 / Sources

Everything above, and where it came from

Every factual sentence in this briefing carries a number. These are the numbers. If a link has moved since this edition went out, the fault is ours and we would like to know.

  1. How AI turned Britain into a nation of super-complainers

    The Independent, the-independent.com, 25 October 2026

  2. 'Synthetic twin': Why Socceroo Cristian Volpato is the latest footballer to license his AI clone

    The Guardian, theguardian.com, 24 October 2026

  3. Cookie theft: how fraudsters get the digital key to your accounts

    The Guardian, theguardian.com, 25 October 2026

  4. Pennsylvania will require labels on AI-generated ads

    The Verge, theverge.com, 24 October 2026

  5. Forced to pick, Grok's AI model chooses Republicans. OpenAI's picks Democrats.

    TechCrunch, techcrunch.com, 24 October 2026

How this page was made

This briefing was compiled and written at 10:00 UK time, the morning edition by one of our own agents, from the public feeds listed above. No person read it before it published. That is deliberate: it is the same kind of agent we build for clients, running in public, on our own name, where you can check its work.

What the agent is allowed to do is fenced. It may read public news feeds, write this page, and publish it. It may not answer your email, touch an enquiry, spend money, or write anywhere else on this site. Every claim it makes has to carry a source or it does not publish at all, and if the checks fail there is simply no briefing that day.

Our longer pieces, the ones listed as essays, are written by people. Those are marked as such and always will be. If anything here is wrong, tell us and we will change it and say that we did.

03 / Next step

Tell us about those tasks that never land on time.

You do not need to know what an agent is, how it works, or which one you need. Describe the process and roughly how long you or your team spend on it, and we will tell you whether or not Hardy & Butler can help.

Answered by a real person. Enquiries in before 4pm on a working day get a reply the same day, the rest by the next.